About: Blanchflower v. Blanchflower

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Blanchflower v. Blanchflower Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBlanchflower_v._Blanchflower

Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Blanchflower v. Blanchflower (en)
rdfs:comment	Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
dcterms:subject	2003 in United States case law 2003 in LGBT history United States LGBT rights case law 2003 in New Hampshire New Hampshire state case law
Wikipage page ID	2487302 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1079302778 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	2003 in United States case law David Blanchflower David Brock 2003 in LGBT history Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders LGBT LGBT rights in New Hampshire United States LGBT rights case law Linda Dalianis Lesbian sexual practices Webster's Third New International Dictionary West Windsor, Vermont Dartmouth College traditions Florida Law Review John T. Broderick Jr. Adultery Lawrence v. Texas 2003 in New Hampshire New Hampshire state case law New Hampshire New Hampshire Supreme Court Sexual intercourse Gay rights dbr:Joseph_Nadeau dbr:James_Duggan_(judge) dbr:University_of_Dayton_Law_Review
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2021/2021015Blaisdell.pdf https://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2003/blanc150.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1041469912256978903 https://www.leagle.com/decision/2003376150nh2261342
sameAs	Blanchflower v. Blanchflower Blanchflower v. Blanchflower Blanchflower v. Blanchflower
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_New_Hampshire_Supreme_Court_case dbt:Law_report
Dissent	Brock (en)
JoinDissent	Broderick (en)
JoinMajority	Duggan, Dalianis (en)
LawsApplied	New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated 458:7, II (en)
ArgueDate	0001-07-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2003 (xsd:integer)
case	Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (en)
DecideDate	0001-11-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2003 (xsd:integer)
fullname	In the matter of David G. Blanchflower and Sian E. Blanchflower (en)
Holding	Adultery is defined as the "voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband." Sexual intercourse is defined as "sexual connection esp. between humans: Coitus, Copulation." Coitus is defined to require "insertion of the penis in the vagina". Adultery within the meaning of the statute designating adultery as a cause for divorce does not include homosexual sexual relationships (en)
justia	https://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2003/blanc150.html
Litigants	David Blanchflower v. Sian Blanchflower (en)
majority	Nadeau (en)
has abstract	Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), is a landmark decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse. (en)
AssociateJudges	Linda Dalianis dbr:Joseph_Nadeau John Broderick (en) James Duggan (en)
ChiefJudge	David Brock
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1041469912256978903
leagle	https://www.leagle.com/decision/2003376150nh2261342
Overruled	In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, No. 2020-0211 , "to the extent that it limits the definition of 'adultery,' as that term is used in RSA 458:7, II, to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex." (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower?oldid=1079302778&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	7014 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	David Blanchflower Blanchflower v Blanchflower LGBT rights in New Hampshire Adultery Sexual intercourse
is Wikipage redirect of	Blanchflower v Blanchflower
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software