This HTML5 document contains 109 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dbpedia-dehttp://de.dbpedia.org/resource/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n11https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
n25https://openjurist.org/32/us/
n19https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n14https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n28http://mdhistory.net/msaref06/barron/html/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n13http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep032/usrep032243/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
dbpedia-ithttp://it.dbpedia.org/resource/
n21https://web.archive.org/web/20080516101253/http:/laws.findlaw.com/us/32/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n16https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/32/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Barron_v._Baltimore
rdf:type
owl:Thing yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Case107308889 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378
rdfs:label
배런 대 볼티모어 사건 Barron v. Baltimore Barron contro Baltimora Barron v. Baltimore
rdfs:comment
Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 1833, which helped define the concept of federalism in US constitutional law. The Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments, establishing a precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 배런 대 볼티모어 사건(Barron v. Baltimore)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 최초로 수정헌법에 보장된 권리는 연방정부로부터만 보호받는 것이고 권리장전이 주정부에 적용될 수 없다고 보았다. Barron contro Baltimora è stato un caso storico della Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America che ha contribuito a definire il concetto di federalismo nel diritto costituzionale degli Stati Uniti. Con questo caso, la Corte ha stabilito che la Carta dei Diritti degli Stati Uniti d'America non si applicava ai governi degli Stati federati, stabilendo un precedente che sarebbe rimasto applicato fino alla ratifica del XIV emendamento della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti d'America. Barron v. Baltimore war ein Präzedenzfall, in dem der Oberste Gerichtshof im Jahr 1833 entschied, dass die U.S. Bill of Rights im Verhältnis zwischen Bürgern und Bundesstaaten nicht anwendbar ist, also dass Bürgern nur die Bürgerrechte zustehen, die ihnen der jeweilige Staat zutritt. Dies wurde später durch Anwendung des im 14. Zusatzartikel verankerten Rechtsstaatsprinzips (due process) umgangen.
foaf:name
John Barron, survivor of John Craig, for the use of Luke Tiernan, Executor of John Craig v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
dcterms:subject
dbc:Takings_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:History_of_Baltimore dbc:Incorporation_case_law dbc:1833_in_Maryland dbc:1833_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
320155
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1106031051
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:John_Bingham dbc:Takings_Clause_case_law dbr:Incorporation_(Bill_of_Rights) dbr:L._Ed. dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Baltimore,_Maryland dbr:Edward_C._Papenfuse dbr:US_constitutional_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Jean_Edward_Smith dbr:State_governments_of_the_United_States dbc:History_of_Baltimore dbr:John_Marshall dbc:Incorporation_case_law dbr:Richard_Peters_(reporter) dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbc:1833_in_Maryland dbc:1833_in_United_States_case_law dbr:US_Bill_of_Rights dbr:Abolitionism_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbr:United_States_v._Cruikshank dbr:Just_compensation dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n11:32us243 n14: n13:usrep032243.pdf n25:243 n16:243 n21:243.html n28:index.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q808974 n19:4y6Ec dbpedia-de:Barron_v._Baltimore freebase:m.01vdp7 dbpedia-ko:배런_대_볼티모어_사건 dbpedia-it:Barron_contro_Baltimora yago-res:Barron_v._Baltimore
dbp:superseded
dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Short_description dbt:Reflist dbt:US5thAmendment dbt:Quote dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:oyez
n11:32us243
dbp:parallelcitations
7
dbp:prior
Accepted on writ of error to the Court of Appeals for the Western Shore of the State of Maryland.
dbp:uspage
243
dbp:usvol
32
dbp:arguedate
0001-02-11
dbp:argueyear
1833
dbp:case
Barron v. Baltimore,
dbp:decidedate
0001-02-16
dbp:decideyear
1833
dbp:findlaw
n21:243.html
dbp:fullname
John Barron, survivor of John Craig, for the use of Luke Tiernan, Executor of John Craig v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
dbp:holding
State governments are not bound by the Bill of Rights.
dbp:justia
n14:
dbp:litigants
Barron v. Baltimore
dbp:majority
Marshall
dbp:loc
n13:usrep032243.pdf
dbo:abstract
Barron contro Baltimora è stato un caso storico della Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America che ha contribuito a definire il concetto di federalismo nel diritto costituzionale degli Stati Uniti. Con questo caso, la Corte ha stabilito che la Carta dei Diritti degli Stati Uniti d'America non si applicava ai governi degli Stati federati, stabilendo un precedente che sarebbe rimasto applicato fino alla ratifica del XIV emendamento della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti d'America. 배런 대 볼티모어 사건(Barron v. Baltimore)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 최초로 수정헌법에 보장된 권리는 연방정부로부터만 보호받는 것이고 권리장전이 주정부에 적용될 수 없다고 보았다. Barron v. Baltimore war ein Präzedenzfall, in dem der Oberste Gerichtshof im Jahr 1833 entschied, dass die U.S. Bill of Rights im Verhältnis zwischen Bürgern und Bundesstaaten nicht anwendbar ist, also dass Bürgern nur die Bürgerrechte zustehen, die ihnen der jeweilige Staat zutritt. Dies wurde später durch Anwendung des im 14. Zusatzartikel verankerten Rechtsstaatsprinzips (due process) umgangen. Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 1833, which helped define the concept of federalism in US constitutional law. The Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments, establishing a precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
dbp:cornell
n16:243
dbp:openjurist
n25:243
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Barron_v._Baltimore?oldid=1106031051&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7367
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Barron_v._Baltimore