United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division, 358 U.S. 103 (1958), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court interpreted the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (NGA) as allowing a gas supply company to unilaterally modify a rate in a natural gas supply contract if the contract specified that the rate was that of the rate schedule filed with the Federal Power Commission (FPC) and the gas company filed a new rate schedule. This case clarified the Mobile-Sierra doctrine established by United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. (1956) and its companion case Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. (1956), which holds that an electricity or natural gas supply rate established resulting from a freely negotiated contract is presumed to be "just and
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, & Water Division (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division, 358 U.S. 103 (1958), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court interpreted the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (NGA) as allowing a gas supply company to unilaterally modify a rate in a natural gas supply contract if the contract specified that the rate was that of the rate schedule filed with the Federal Power Commission (FPC) and the gas company filed a new rate schedule. This case clarified the Mobile-Sierra doctrine established by United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. (1956) and its companion case Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. (1956), which holds that an electricity or natural gas supply rate established resulting from a freely negotiated contract is presumed to be "just and (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Black, Frankfurter, Burton, Whittaker (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - National Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 et seq. (en)
|
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, & Water Division, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - A gas company could may unilaterally modify a rate in a contract by filing a new rate schedule if the contract specifies that the rate is that on the rate schedule on file with the Federal Power Commission (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, and Water Division, 358 U.S. 103 (1958), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court interpreted the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (NGA) as allowing a gas supply company to unilaterally modify a rate in a natural gas supply contract if the contract specified that the rate was that of the rate schedule filed with the Federal Power Commission (FPC) and the gas company filed a new rate schedule. This case clarified the Mobile-Sierra doctrine established by United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. (1956) and its companion case Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. (1956), which holds that an electricity or natural gas supply rate established resulting from a freely negotiated contract is presumed to be "just and reasonable" and thus acceptable under the NGA or Federal Power Act (FPA). (en)
|
ArgueDateA
| |
ArgueDateB
| |
googlescholar
| |
NotParticipating
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |