About: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRegents_of_the_University_of_California_v._Bakke

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) involved a dispute of whether preferential treatment for minorities can reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution. The case was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	캘리포니아 주립대 대 바키 사건 (ko) Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (en) 加州大学董事会诉巴基案 (zh)
rdfs:comment	캘리포니아 주립대 대 바키 사건(University of California v. Bakke)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례로 적극적 우대조치로써 인종이 대학입시에서 고려될 수 있는 요소임을 판시하였다. 단 특정 인종의 비율을 정해 놓은 는 위헌임을 선언하여 캘리포니아 주립대 데이비스 캠퍼스 의과대학원의 정책이 위법이라고 판시하였다. (ko) Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) involved a dispute of whether preferential treatment for minorities can reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution. The case was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible. (en) 加州大学董事会诉巴基案（Regents of the University of California v. Bakke）， U.S. 265 (1978),是美国联邦最高法院裁决的一个里程碑式案件，支持了肯定性行动（又称平权法案），允许高校招生时将种族作为考量的多个因素之一。不过判决中也质疑了一些特定的程序，如加州大学戴维斯分校医学院每100个招生名额中要有16个少数族裔学生配额的规定是不受允许的。虽然最高法院已经宣布学校中的种族隔离是非法的，并且下令校区采取措施确保种族融合，但由大学自愿采取的肯定性行动措施的合法性问题尚未得到解决。支持者认为需要有这样的措施来对过去的歧视加以弥补，而反对者则认为这样的措施是非法的，违反了美利坚合众国宪法第十四条修正案的平等保護條款。1974年时曾有一个（DeFunis v. Odegaard）上诉到最高法院，该案直接涉及的就是肯定性行动的合宪性问题，但最终法院以程序方面的原因驳回了案件。 (zh)
foaf:name	Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke (en)
skos:exactMatch	http://globalwordnet.org/ili/i41632
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	University and college admissions United States Supreme Court cases 1978 in education 1978 in United States case law United States affirmative action case law United States racial discrimination case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court United States education case law University of California, Davis University of California litigation
Wikipage page ID	169477 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1119113358 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Supreme Court Amicus curiae Potter Stewart Presidency of Jimmy Carter Robert M. O'Neil Rochester, Minnesota Ronald Dworkin Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States David S. Saxon DeFunis v. Odegaard Democratic Party (United States) University and college admissions John Paul Stevens Robert Bork United States Marine Corps University of California, Davis University of Minnesota University of Washington School of Law Desegregation busing Initiatives and referendums in the United States List of landmark court decisions in the United States Racial integration School segregation in the United States Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 United States Supreme Court cases College admissions in the United States Coral Gables, Florida Coral Gables Senior High School Mayo Clinic Ruth Bader Ginsburg Strict scrutiny William J. Brennan, Jr. Civil Rights Act of 1964 Civil Rights Movement Eleanor Holmes Norton Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Mootness NASA Bloomberg BNA The Wall Street Journal The Washington Post Equal Protection Clause Honorable discharge 1978 in education Lewis F. Powell Jr. Los Angeles Times California Law Review Stanley Mosk Plurality opinion Brown v. Board of Education C-SPAN CCH (company) 1978 in United States case law United States affirmative action case law United States racial discrimination case law Thurgood Marshall Wade H. McCree Ward Connerly Warren E. Burger Watergate Webster v. Reproductive Health Services Rehnquist Court

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software