About: Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FNetscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad

Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It affirmed that public use or commercialization of an invention more than one year prior to the filing date will cost the inventor his patent rights (see also 35 U.S.C. § 100-105). The inventor in this case was Allan M. Konrad, a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory employee who devised and implemented a method for accessing and searching data objects stored on a remote computer (U.S. patents 5,544,320; 5,696,901; 5,974,444). Netscape moved to invalidate Konrad's patents in U.S. district court immediately after Konrad filed a patent infringement suit against Netscape customers. The district court concluded that Konrad's patents were invali

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad (en)
rdfs:comment	Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It affirmed that public use or commercialization of an invention more than one year prior to the filing date will cost the inventor his patent rights (see also 35 U.S.C. § 100-105). The inventor in this case was Allan M. Konrad, a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory employee who devised and implemented a method for accessing and searching data objects stored on a remote computer (U.S. patents 5,544,320; 5,696,901; 5,974,444). Netscape moved to invalidate Konrad's patents in U.S. district court immediately after Konrad filed a patent infringement suit against Netscape customers. The district court concluded that Konrad's patents were invali (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cases United States patent case law 2002 in United States case law Software patent case law Netscape litigation
Wikipage page ID	24455215 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1026760169 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	On-sale bar Patent office Pauline Newman United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Department of Energy United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas United States District Court for the Northern District of California University of California Declaratory judgment Patent infringement United States patent law Patent Public domain Haldane Robert Mayer United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cases United States patent case law 2002 in United States case law Software patent case law Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Sharon Prost Confidentiality agreement Netscape litigation U.S. Department of Energy Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory America Online, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Legal precedent F.3d Netscape Communications Corp. U.S.P.Q.2d U.S. district court dbr:Baxter_v._Cobe dbr:Group_One,_Ltd._v._Hallmark_Cards,_Inc. dbr:In_re_Caveney dbr:Lough_v._Brunswick_Corp. dbr:Petrolite_Corp._v._Baker_Hugher,_Inc.
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/778288/netscape-communications-corporation-plaintiffcounterclaim-and-microsoft/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/295/1315/597227/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15836521221307364649
sameAs	Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad
Subsequent	0001-08-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case
Prior	Finding for plaintiff, Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, No. 00-20789 (en)
case	25920.0 (second)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/778288/netscape-communications-corporation-plaintiffcounterclaim-and-microsoft/
DecideDate	0001-07-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2002 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Netscape Communications Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and America Online, Inc. v. Konrad (en)
Holding	Konrad's patents are ineligible for patent protection in the United States because they were publicly used and commercialized more than one year prior to the patent filing date. (en)
judges	Pauline Newman Haldane Robert Mayer Sharon Prost
justia	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/295/1315/597227/
keywords	On-sale bar Patent
Litigants	Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad (en)
has abstract	Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It affirmed that public use or commercialization of an invention more than one year prior to the filing date will cost the inventor his patent rights (see also 35 U.S.C. § 100-105). The inventor in this case was Allan M. Konrad, a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory employee who devised and implemented a method for accessing and searching data objects stored on a remote computer (U.S. patents 5,544,320; 5,696,901; 5,974,444). Netscape moved to invalidate Konrad's patents in U.S. district court immediately after Konrad filed a patent infringement suit against Netscape customers. The district court concluded that Konrad's patents were invalid because they did not meet the public-use and on-sale bar eligibility criteria of 35 U.S.C. § 102b.In particular, the district court found that Konrad (1) placed his invention in the public domain by demonstrating it to others without a confidentiality agreement and (2) tried to sell it to other legal entities, both more than one year before he filed for the patent. The appeals court, upon review, affirmed the district court decision for the same reasons. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15836521221307364649
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad?oldid=1026760169&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	14905 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Legal person Netscape Commc'ns Corp. v. Konrad Netscape v konrad
is Wikipage redirect of	Netscape Commc'ns Corp. v. Konrad Netscape v konrad
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software