About: Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FHunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade. However, displaying the USDA grade was not required. Washington state, a major apple producer, used apple standards superior to those used by the USDA. The Court found that North Carolina's law violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against Washington state apple producers while working to the advantage of local North Carolina apple growers.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (en)
  • 헌트 대 워싱턴 주 사과광고국 사건 (ko)
rdfs:comment
  • 헌트 대 워싱턴주 사과광고국 사건(Hunt v Washington State Apple Advertising Commission)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미국 워싱턴주는 미국내 주요 사과산지로 많은 양을 다른 주에 수출하고 있었다. 노스캐롤라이나 주는 각 주의 품질기준 대신 미국농림부 기준 품질마크를 주내 사과상자에 요구하였다. 그러자 워싱턴 주는 노스캐롤라이나주 사과농장에게 혜택을 주기 위한 이 통상조항위반이라고 하여 소를 제기하였다. (ko)
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade. However, displaying the USDA grade was not required. Washington state, a major apple producer, used apple standards superior to those used by the USDA. The Court found that North Carolina's law violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against Washington state apple producers while working to the advantage of local North Carolina apple growers. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
JoinMajority
  • unanimous court (en)
LawsApplied
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Washington State Apple Advertising Comm'n v. Holshouser, 408 F. Supp. 857 (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, (en)
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (en)
Holding
  • North Carolina violated the Commerce Clause by discriminating against out-of-state apple growers. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (en)
majority
  • Burger (en)
loc
has abstract
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade. However, displaying the USDA grade was not required. Washington state, a major apple producer, used apple standards superior to those used by the USDA. The Court found that North Carolina's law violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against Washington state apple producers while working to the advantage of local North Carolina apple growers. John R. Jordan, Jr., argued the cause for Hunt. With him on the brief were Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Millard R. Rich, Jr., Deputy Attorney General. Slade Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, argued the cause for the Washington State Apple Advertising Commission. With him on the brief were Edward B. Mackie, Deputy Attorney General, and James Arneil, Special Assistant Attorney General. (en)
  • 헌트 대 워싱턴주 사과광고국 사건(Hunt v Washington State Apple Advertising Commission)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미국 워싱턴주는 미국내 주요 사과산지로 많은 양을 다른 주에 수출하고 있었다. 노스캐롤라이나 주는 각 주의 품질기준 대신 미국농림부 기준 품질마크를 주내 사과상자에 요구하였다. 그러자 워싱턴 주는 노스캐롤라이나주 사과농장에게 혜택을 주기 위한 이 통상조항위반이라고 하여 소를 제기하였다. (ko)
cornell
googlescholar
NotParticipating
  • Rehnquist (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 56 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software