About: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCelotex_Corp._v._Catrett

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case. A broader version of that doctrine was later formally added to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Celotex Corp. v. Catrett (en) سيلوتكس ضد كاتريت (ar)
rdfs:comment	سيلوتكس ضد.كاتريت،477 الولايات المتحده.317 (1986) كانت قضية حكمت بها المحكمة العليا في الولايات المتحدة، كتبت بواسطة القاضي المساعد وليام رينكويست.في سيلوتكس، علقت المحكمة أن الطرف الذي تحرك من أجل إصدار حكم عاجل يحتاج فقط إلى أن يظهر أن الطرف الثاني يفتقر إلى الأدلة الكافية لدعم قضيته. النسخة المحدودة من هذا المبدأ أضيف لاحقا بشكل رسمي إلى .سيلوتيكس كانت واحده من «ثلاثية» قرارت المحكمة العليا المستعجلة الصادرة في عام 1986, والاثنان الآخران هما لوبي ....خلال 20 سنه أصبح هؤلاء الثلاثة أكثر قرارت المحكمة المستشهد بها في نظام المحاكم الفدرالية الأمريكية. (ar) Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case. A broader version of that doctrine was later formally added to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Celotex Corporation v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett (en)
dcterms:subject	1986 in United States case law Asbestos disasters United States Supreme Court cases United States summary judgment case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
Wikipage page ID	7939128 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1096532428 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	1986 in United States case law Asbestos disasters List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 477 List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit United States District Court for the District of Columbia Strict liability United States Supreme Court cases Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Negligence Federal Rules of Civil Procedure United States summary judgment case law William Rehnquist Corporations Hearsay Celotex Adickes v. S.H. Kress Co. Asbestos United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Chicago L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Associate Justice Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume Summary judgment Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Breach of warranty Manufacturers U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.lawlio.com/opinion/111722/celotex-corporation-v-myrtle-nell-catrett-administratrix-of-the-estate-of https://web.archive.org/web/20090211161527/http:/www.lawnix.com/cases/celotex-catrett.html
sameAs	Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_book dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfnp dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Stevens (en) Brennan (en)
JoinDissent	Burger, Blackmun (en)
JoinMajority	White, Marshall, Powell, O'Connor (en)
LawsApplied	Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (en)
ParallelCitations	259200.0 (second)
Prior	Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (en)
USPage	317 (xsd:integer)
USVol	477 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1986 (xsd:integer)
DecideDate	0001-06-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1986 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Celotex Corporation v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett (en)
Holding	A party moving for summary judgment show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case. (en)
Litigants	Celotex Corp. v. Catrett (en)
majority	Rehnquist (en)
has abstract	سيلوتكس ضد.كاتريت،477 الولايات المتحده.317 (1986) كانت قضية حكمت بها المحكمة العليا في الولايات المتحدة، كتبت بواسطة القاضي المساعد وليام رينكويست.في سيلوتكس، علقت المحكمة أن الطرف الذي تحرك من أجل إصدار حكم عاجل يحتاج فقط إلى أن يظهر أن الطرف الثاني يفتقر إلى الأدلة الكافية لدعم قضيته. النسخة المحدودة من هذا المبدأ أضيف لاحقا بشكل رسمي إلى .سيلوتيكس كانت واحده من «ثلاثية» قرارت المحكمة العليا المستعجلة الصادرة في عام 1986, والاثنان الآخران هما لوبي ....خلال 20 سنه أصبح هؤلاء الثلاثة أكثر قرارت المحكمة المستشهد بها في نظام المحاكم الفدرالية الأمريكية. (ar) Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case. A broader version of that doctrine was later formally added to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Celotex was one of a "trilogy" of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on summary judgment issued in 1986, the other two being Anderson v. Liberty Lobby and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.. Within 20 years these three became the most-cited Supreme Court decisions in the U.S. federal court system. (en)
Concurrence	White (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett?oldid=1096532428&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	7028 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of environmental lawsuits List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. 477 U.S. 317 Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. Celotex Asbestos and the law Celotex Corp. v Catrett

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 62 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software