About: Brandenburg v. Ohio     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBrandenburg_v._Ohio

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action". Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927) was explicitly overruled, and Schenck v. United States (1919), Abrams v. United States (1919), Gitlow v. New York (1925), and Dennis v. United States (1951). were effectively overturned.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (en)
  • Brandenburg vs. Ohio (cs)
  • ブランデンバーグ対オハイオ州事件 (ja)
  • 布兰登伯格诉俄亥俄州案 (zh)
rdfs:comment
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444 (1969) je jeden z případů amerického Nejvyššího soudu, které formovaly americkou ústavu. Určil hranice svobody projevu ve Spojených státech amerických. (cs)
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action". Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927) was explicitly overruled, and Schenck v. United States (1919), Abrams v. United States (1919), Gitlow v. New York (1925), and Dennis v. United States (1951). were effectively overturned. (en)
  • ブランデンバーグ対オハイオ州事件(ブランデンバーグたいオハイオしゅうじけん、Brandenburg v. Ohio)395 U.S. 444 (1969)は、アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所が、 アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条に関するランドマーク的な判決を言い渡した事件。裁判所は、その表現が「差し迫った違法行為を唱道するか、またはそのような行為を生ぜしめる可能性が高い場合」でない限り、その表現者を処罰することは出来ないと判決した。この判決により、裁判所はオハイオ州の犯罪サンディカリズム法が暴力の単なるアドボカシーを過度に広範に禁じているとして、その法律を無効にした。 (ja)
  • 布兰登伯格诉俄亥俄州案(英語:Brandenburg v. Ohio),395 U.S. 444 (1969),是美国最高法院具有里程碑意义的案件,法院根據美國憲法第一修正案裁定,政府不得惩罚發表煽动性言论的人,除非该人發表的言论“煽动他人立即實施违法行為”,而且该煽动性言論的确可能会造成他人立即犯罪。美國最高法院否决了俄亥俄州的《组织犯罪防治法》,《组织犯罪防治法》禁止任何人發表有關犯罪、破坏、暴力或其他恐怖手段的言論。 (zh)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Clarence Brandenburg v. State of Ohio (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software